Behavioral Sciences and the Rules Behav. Sci. Law 22: 395–414 (2004) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: twelve. 1002/bsl. 595
Serial Killing in America: Case Studies of Seven Offenders
James To. Beasley II, B. S., M. G. A. *
This article summarizes and compares information on several interviewed dramon killers within an ongoing task designed to research similarities and differences amongst these individuals. The purpose of this article is to enhance our group knowledge of the dynamics of serial tough by examining the perpetrators' backgrounds, and also the unique ways that they look at themselves as well as the world around them. Although qualitative interview study alone is usually not sufﬁcient to fully figure out such patterns, it is within many ways. A few of the information talked about based on the seven offenders interviewed is compared with larger epidemiological research, and the strengths and limits of each form of research are discussed. Released in 2004 by Steve Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The initial FBI study in sexual murder and offense scene analysis, which included selection interviews with twenty-five serial murderers by the Behavioral Science Product (BSU) in the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia, was published almost 20 years before (The Males Who Killed, 1985). Since that time, the phenomenon of dramon murder has become mythologized in popular culture, sensationalized by media, and increasingly looked at by academia. The effects have been confounding, with ﬁction blurring with fact, and assumptions and guesses frequently treated while certainty. Several misperceptions happen to be associated with the strategy of proﬁling, which involves examination of offense scenes to set up a set of behavioral traits probably found in a certain offender. Right now there is a prevalent belief that proﬁling is an almost magical experience, and that it is always accurate and very clear cut. Yet , violent lawbreaker behavior is incredibly variable, producing precise predictions problematic. A few researchers include addressed the issue of predictability, included in this Farrington (1982); Goldberg (2000); Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990); and Malmquist (1996). Despite some acceptance of the notion of earlier violent actions being predictive of foreseeable future such actions (Samenow, 1998; Widom & Toch, 2000), there exists a wide variety of psychological theories about legal behavior that are varied and frequently conﬂicting (Hall, 1999; Widom & Toch, 2000). Since Fox and Levin (2001) have warned, ‘‘correlation will not imply causing, '' and
*Correspondence to: James To. Beasley 2, B. S., M. P. A., Organization Special Agent, National Middle for the Analysis of Violent Crime, FBI Schools, Quantico, VA 22135, U. S. A. E-mail: [email protected] edu
This article is a U. S. Government work and is also in the legal in the U. S. A.
M. O. Beasley
‘‘correlation as well does not assure predictability'' (pp. 26–28). Centered partly upon these predictability issues, several academics have got raised concerns over the validity of proﬁling, and have required more empirical research (Homant & Kennedy, 1998; Kocsis, Hayes, & Irwin, 2002). Some have gone further, criticizing perceived shortcomings of early on proﬁling research ﬁndings and resulting procedures (Egger, 1998), including a few done by the FBI (Godwin, 2000). Other folks (Holmes & Holmes, 2002) have observed the failing of F researchers to reveal their strategy regarding interviews of a number of the prominent killers in their research. That dramon murder and proﬁling are getting to be so ﬁxed within our nationwide psyche shows that these themes serve, even though true, because more than one of a kind criminal actions and an associated investigative tool; they may have entered the realm of entertainment (Tithecott, 1997). Narratives and points of these offences and those whom commit all of them seem to horrify, to concern, and to fulfill our dark curiosity. Commentary about these persons often contains large dosages of drama....
References: Alison, L., Bennell, C., Mokros, A., & Ormerod, Deb. (2002). The personality paradox in arrest proﬁling: A theoretical review of the processes associated with deriving backdrop characteristics via crime picture actions. Mindset, Public Insurance plan, and Rules, 8(1), 115–135. Beyer, T. R., & Beasley, J. O. (2003). non-family child abductors whom murder their victims: Arrest demographics coming from interviews with incarcerated offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Assault, 18(10), 1167–1188. Boudreaux, M. C., God, W. D., & Dutra, R. D. (1999). Child abduction: Age-based analyses of offender, patient, and criminal offense characteristics in 550 circumstances of so-called child disappearance. Journal of Forensic Savoir, 44(3), 539–553. Boudreaux, Meters. C., Master, W. Deb., & Jarvis, J. L. (2001). Behavioral perspectives in child murder: The position of gain access to, vulnerability, and routine activities theory. Stress, Violence and Abuse, 2(1), 56–78. Cleckley, H. (1982). The face mask of state of mind. St . John, MO: Mosby. Egger, S. (1998). The killers in our midst: An examination of serial homicide and its research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Farrington, D. G. (1982). Longitudinal analyses of criminal assault. In M. E. Wolfgang, & D. A. Weiner (Eds. ), Criminal assault (pp. 171–200). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Fox, M. A., & Levin, T. (2001). The need to destroy: Making sense of senseless murder. Needham Heights, MUM: Allyn and Bacon. Godwin, G. Meters. (2000). Hunting serial predators: A multivariate classiﬁcation method of proﬁling chaotic behavior. Huraco Raton: CRC Press. Goldberg, C. (2000). The evil we do: The psychoanalysis of dangerous people. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. Gottfredson, Meters. R., & Hirschi, Capital t. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Hall, L. V. (1999). Overview of lethal violence. In H. Sixth is v. Hall (Ed. ), Lethal violence: A sourcebook on fatal domestic, acquaintance and stranger physical violence (pp. 1–51). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Hare, R. G. (1993). With no conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Ny: Guilford. Hare, R., & Hart, S i9000. (1997). Psychopathy and the PCL-R: Clinical and forensic applications. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. Hickey, E. (1997). Serial criminals and their patients (2nd ed. ). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Holmes, Ur. M., & Holmes, S. T. (2002). Proﬁling violent crimes: An investigative application (3rd male impotence. ). Thousand Oaks, CALIFORNIA: Sage. Homant, R. T., & Kennedy, D. W. (1998). Internal aspects of crime scene proﬁling: Validity research. Criminal Justice and Tendencies, 25(3), 319–343. Kocsis, 3rd there�s r. N., Hayes, A. F., & Irwin, H. T. (2002). Examinative experience and accuracy in psychological proﬁling of a chaotic crime. Diary of Social Violence, 17(8), 811–823. Malmquist, C. P. (1996). Murder: A psychiatric perspective. Wa, DC: American Psychiatric Press. Men Who Murdered, The. (1985, August). FBI Police force Bulletin, 2–31. Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, D. J. (1990). Criminal persona proﬁling: An outcome and process research. Law and Human Habit, 14(3), 215–233. Protection of youngsters From Sexual Predators Act of 1998, Public Regulation No . 105–314, 105th Our elected representatives, page 112, Title VII, Section 703. Ressler, R. K., Burgess, A. T., & Douglas, J. E. (1988). Sexual homicide: Habits and reasons. New York: Lexington. Safarik, Meters. E., Jarvis, J., & Nussbaum, T. (2000). Elderly female dramon sexual murder: A limited scientific test of criminal researched analysis. Homicide Studies, 4(3), 294–307. Samenow, S. At the. (1998). Straight talk wireless about scammers. Northvale, NJ-NEW JERSEY: Aronson. Skrapec, C. A. (2001). Phenomenology and serial murder: Asking different concerns. Homicide Studies, 5(1), 46–63. Tithecott, 3rd there�s r. (1997). Of men and monsters: Jeffrey Dahmer and the construction in the serial monster. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Published in 2005 by Ruben Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Behav. Sci. Law 22: 395–414 (2004)
L. O. Beasley
Warren, T. I., Hazelwood, R. R., & Dietz, P. E. (1996). The sexually sadistic serial great. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41, 970–974. Widom, C. S., & Toch, H. (2000). The contribution of psychology to criminal proper rights research. In D. They would. Fishbein (Ed. ), The science, treatment, and prevention of antisocial behaviours: Application for the criminal proper rights system (pp. 3-1 to 3-19). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute. Wilson, L., Lincoln, Ur., & Kocsis, R. (1997). Validity, energy and integrity of proﬁling for dramon violent and sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Rules, 4(1), 1–12. Witte, G. (2000). Dramon homicide: A pluridisciplinary review. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MCP Hahnemann University & Villanova University of Rules.
Published in 2004 by John Wiley & Daughters, Ltd.
Behav. Sci. Regulation 22: 395–414 (2004)